IT security & auditing
Understand your exposure.
Which systems must stay available, which information matters most and who can access it? We structure these questions and prepare a security review whose findings can become concrete operational actions.
Let’s talk it throughGo beyond the overview. Explore how it works.
Inside the work
See what protects you.
Find what is missing.
↓Trace a critical business process to its systems, accounts and providers so the review has a defensible scope.
Scroll to move through chapters. Select a record to examine the connection.
The engagement / 01
Know what needs protecting
A useful review needs a defined scope. We identify important applications, information and providers, then discuss what an outage would mean for the business.
Systems and dependencies
Workstations, cloud services, central applications and external access are brought into one view. Particularly critical workflows receive priority in the review.
Understand access
User accounts, administrative permissions and joiner or leaver processes are examined, revealing missing ownership or unnecessarily broad access.
The engagement / 02
Commission the right assessment
An organisational review and technical security testing serve different purposes. We help define questions and scope for the technical specialists you appoint.
Clear boundaries
Targets, permitted methods, contacts and timing are agreed in advance. Technical tests require explicit authorisation from the entitled commissioning party.
Prioritise findings
Findings are ranked by business significance, urgency and effort. A long vulnerability list is of little use without an understandable order of action.
The engagement / 03
Build resilience into daily operations
Security is maintained through recurring work. We support the organisational planning of actions, follow-up and realistic preparation for disruption.
Practise recovery
Backups, restoration and reachable contacts should be considered together. A documented plan becomes testable through an appropriate exercise.
Assign responsibility
Each agreed action receives an owner and review date. System changes are recorded as triggers for reassessment.
Support that fits the work ahead.
Choose a starting point for discussion. Tasks, participants and fees are agreed individually.
Security baseline
Establish the technical starting point and principal risks.
- Infrastructure and access
- Safeguards and recovery
- Prioritised findings
Technical assessment
Focus reviews on critical systems and workflows.
- Vulnerability assessment within an authorised scope
- Cloud configuration and process risks
- Actions and owners
Operational resilience
Consider technology, behaviour and daily work together.
- Social engineering and email
- Payments, passwords and encryption
- Documents, remote working and incident procedures
A basis for discussion, not a binding service catalogue. Selection confirms neither availability nor professional authorisation. Any required legal, tax or specialist work is separately agreed and commissioned.
Questions about our work.
01Does an audit guarantee protection against attacks?+
No. A review covers a defined scope at a particular time. It helps identify risks and prioritise action but does not replace ongoing security work.
02Does the review have to attack systems?+
Not every assessment requires offensive technical testing. Scope and methods follow the agreed objective and are approved with the responsible people beforehand.
No matching entries found.